<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>QPerfmon Discussions Rss Feed</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/Thread/List.aspx</link><description>QPerfmon Discussions Rss Description</description><item><title>New Post: Which counter represents CPU usage and Memory Usage of a process running in the system.</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/433073</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Add a new Counter, go to the 'Category' 'Process' -&amp;gt; Counter '% Processor Time' (for CPU). For memory you have a choice of 'Private Bytes', 'Virtual Bytes' or 'Working Set' depending on your needs. Use Google to find out what each one mean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>RudolfHenning</author><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:25:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Which counter represents CPU usage and Memory Usage of a process running in the system. 20130214012505P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Which counter represents CPU usage and Memory Usage of a process running in the system.</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/433073</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
I want to monitor the CPU usage and Memory usage of a particular process running in the system. For that which all counter I should add..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Akansh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>akansh</author><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:10:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Which counter represents CPU usage and Memory Usage of a process running in the system. 20130214071017A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: wildcards?</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/278807</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;looks great! &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>qcjamess</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:37:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: wildcards? 20111115073744P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: wildcards?</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/278807</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;You'll be happy to note that the latest version now has the ability to add multiple counters and instances at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>RudolfHenning</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:09:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: wildcards? 20111114050936A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: wildcards?</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/278807</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eish, it is one of those things I've been wishing for myself :) Just haven't got around to actually implement it... Stay tuned, I'll get there eventually!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>RudolfHenning</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:36:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: wildcards? 20111109033643P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: wildcards?</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/278807</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;how about adding the ability to use wildcards when selecting a counter? &amp;nbsp;or the ability to select all instances (like in perfmon) of a counter object for monitoring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;example: &amp;nbsp;I would like to create a qpmset that I can quickly load to monitor all relevant counters on a sql server. &amp;nbsp;Our systems may have multiple instances, as well as different logical disks. &amp;nbsp;Having useable wildcards and the &amp;lt;all instances&amp;gt;
 selection ability would make it easy to create a default qpmset that covers all SQL instances regardless of instance name as well as all logical drives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>qcjamess</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: wildcards? 20111109073414A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/276780</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andreone</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7 20111023091602P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/276780</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I added a simple zip archive under the download tab that only contains the raw assemblies. However, the MSI is the preferred way to install the application as it does a whole lot of other things to set up things for you (e.g. register the qpmset files, check .Net dependencies etc.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>RudolfHenning</author><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7 20111022081405A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/discussions/276780</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You introduced msi installer with version 1.7. I find that very inconvenient as my company don't allow developers to install software on our machines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also thinks that for a little tool like QPerfMon, an installer is overkill but that's just my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you provide a simple zip like you did before?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>andreone</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Could you provide simple archive version as before v1.7 20111021093316P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Save counters to csv file</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=216068</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've have been thinking of doing exactly that for a while now. Just hold on a little bit longer until I get around to implement this. Of course, 'playing' back those 'values' in the csv file is also something I would like to implement but not sure how I will implement that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>RudolfHenning</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:39:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Save counters to csv file 20100617043937A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Save counters to csv file</title><link>http://qperfmon.codeplex.com/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=216068</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Hi,

does qperfmon support to write the values to a file (csv for example)
If not: Do you plan to integrate this.

What we want to do is monitoring the performance counters offline on an machine which is used in industrial environment at our customer.
If our program does not work anymore for any reason they turn off and on the computer. Then all data is lost.
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>osre</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:58:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Save counters to csv file 20100615115827A</guid></item></channel></rss>